Software engineering has always evolved alongside its abstractions. We started by managing memory, then abstracted away hardware. We moved from writing monolithic applications to composing distributed services. And now, we’re on the cusp of the next abstraction shift: from writing individual functions to designing systems of autonomous agents that think, act, and collaborate.
However, this isn’t about replacing developers, instead we are reframing their highest-value work. The next generation of engineering won’t be defined by how many lines of code you write — but by how well you design the systems that write, adapt, and reason alongside you.
The Core Skills of Agentic Engineering
In the emerging era of agent-based systems, the engineering stack changes — but the core skills evolve rather than disappear. Here’s what technical teams will need to master:
Grounding agents with knowledge architectures
An agent is only as reliable as the context it operates within. That means designing knowledge bases with the same rigor we apply to APIs or data schemas: versioning, provenance tracking, update pipelines, and consistency guarantees. Your retrieval strategy becomes part of your system architecture, not an afterthought.
Engineering prompts as system design
System prompts are no longer documentation — they’re part of the codebase. They define role boundaries, error-handling expectations, safety constraints, and decision trees. Contextual prompting acts as the “interface layer” between user intent and model reasoning.
Think of it as designing a state machine in natural language: if the blueprint is weak, the system is brittle.
Feedback loops as continuous integration
A static agent is a liability. Instrumentation, telemetry, and self-critique mechanisms allow agents to learn from outputs and evolve. Validator or “judge” agents, human-in-the-loop review, and performance scoring pipelines create the equivalent of CI/CD for cognition — continuously testing assumptions and improving behavior.
From Bots to Multi-Agent Systems
Most current AI tools are single-purpose: they retrieve, summarize, or automate in isolation. The next wave is compositional — networks of specialized agents communicating through well-defined protocols.
A typical architecture might include:
- Domain-specific specialists — narrow-scope agents with deep knowledge of a vertical (e.g., SEO opportunity detection, compliance review).
- Coordinator or planner agents — responsible for breaking complex goals into subtasks and delegating.
- Validator agents — acting as QA gates, checking accuracy, bias, or alignment before actions are committed.
- Execution agents — responsible for taking validated plans and interfacing with APIs, databases, or services.
These systems resemble microservice architectures: independently deployable, loosely coupled, and designed for composability. Orchestration layers — whether custom built or using frameworks like LangGraph, CrewAI, or similar — become as critical as message queues and service meshes were in distributed systems.
Old Principles, New Patterns
The shift to agentic systems doesn’t throw away everything we know — it repurposes it:
- Modularity → Agent specialization
- Scalability → Parallel task execution and dynamic orchestration
- Observability → Multi-agent telemetry, tracing, and explainability layers
- CI/CD → Feedback loops and continuous prompt/knowledge refinement
- DX → “AX” (Agent Experience): how context, interfaces, and guardrails shape agent performance
The patterns that once governed distributed systems now govern distributed cognition.
Blueprint and Foundation: Where It All Begins
Every successful system shares two constants:
- The system prompt is the blueprint. It defines the architecture of reasoning: the roles, responsibilities, failure states, and hand-offs between components.
- The knowledge base is the foundation. Without a reliable, version-controlled source of truth, even the best agents become hallucination machines.
When these two layers are designed well, the rest — orchestration, coordination, evolution — becomes exponentially easier.
The Shift Ahead for Engineering Teams
This paradigm doesn’t eliminate traditional software engineering; it layers a new set of abstractions on top of it. We will still write APIs, manage data models, and deploy infrastructure. But increasingly, our work will involve designing the behavior and interaction of intelligent components rather than hard-coding every detail ourselves.
Engineering organizations that embrace this shift early — investing in prompt architectures, retrieval infrastructure, and agent orchestration — will move faster, learn faster, and solve harder problems.
Because in this new era, the question won’t be “Can you build it?”
It will be “Can you orchestrate the system that builds it for you?”
andersonnjen.com 