Most people see either the tech problem OR the people problem. I see how they interact.
I have a PhD in Behavioral Neuroscience from the University of Illinois Chicago, where I studied how the brain processes signals under complexity and cognitive load. My research focused on visual perception—specifically, why the same signal can be highly visible or completely invisible depending on context, position, and surrounding noise.
I discovered that perception isn't about signal strength. It's about:
Then I spent 10 years leading engineering teams at scale—plus fractional CTO and startup advisory work.
As Fractional CTO for an early-stage startup, I provided technical leadership and strategic guidance on product-market fit and technical architecture decisions. I've mentored startup co-founders on technical strategy, team building, decision-making under uncertainty, and navigating the transition from founder-led to team-led engineering.
At The Aspen Group (2019-2024), I was Senior Director of Engineering on the executive team, leading 20+ engineers across 5 national brands. I drove 60% performance improvements on location pages through technical optimization and led platform modernization initiatives.
At Peapod Digital Labs (2018-2019), I led an 87% performance improvement (Time to Interactive: 29.9s → 3.9s) that directly impacted conversion and user experience for a high-traffic e-commerce platform.
At ECRA Group (2015-2018), I led software development for educational assessment platforms serving K-12 schools nationwide, managing cross-functional engineering teams.
What I discovered across all these roles: Engineering teams fail to detect system problems for the same reasons brains fail to detect visual signals.
It's not that the signal isn't there. It's that:
I call this "Behavioral Drift"—when system behavior gradually diverges from intended behavior, but remains imperceptible until it's too late.
This insight became the foundation for everything I do now.
I coined this term to describe a phenomenon I observed both in my PhD research and in engineering organizations.
Behavioral Drift occurs when system behavior gradually diverges from intended behavior, but remains imperceptible due to specific conditions that prevent detection.
In visual neuroscience, we know that the same stimulus can be highly visible or completely invisible depending on:
The exact same patterns show up in engineering teams:
Traditional engineering metrics show WHAT is happening.
My work reveals WHY teams miss the signals that matter—and how to make invisible problems visible before they become crises.
This framework powers both Aurvia (decision consulting) and Operion (team analytics platform).
I run two companies that apply behavioral science to engineering leadership:
Decision Science Consulting + Applied Research Lab
I help CTOs and engineering executives unstick high-stakes decisions that have stalled for months.
These are decisions with:
Consulting: 2-4 week engagements that surface the hidden patterns blocking your decision and create a clear path forward.
Lab (Ask-Jentic AI): Where I test new decision frameworks, build AI-assisted analysis tools, and experiment with behavioral measurement approaches before bringing them to clients. Current lab projects include AI agent orchestration patterns and early-warning systems for team cognitive load.
→ Learn more at aurvia.ioTeam Behavioral Health Analytics
I built this platform to make invisible work visible—detecting burnout signals, cognitive overload, and collaboration breakdowns before they become problems.
Based on the same research that powers Aurvia consulting:
The Challenge: Build production-worthy SaaS using AI agentic teammates with human-in-the-middle orchestration. I'm learning firsthand what works (and what doesn't) about leveraging AI in real engineering workflows—and how to run a business as CEO.
Currently in private beta for engineering leaders managing 10-50 person teams.
→ Learn more at operion.app